This graphic from the New York Times illustrates the different environmental costs of meat and vegetable production (click on image to enlarge):
Images for use in sociology (and related) classes.
This graphic from the New York Times illustrates the different environmental costs of meat and vegetable production (click on image to enlarge):
Posted by Lisa Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 3:20 PM 1 comments Labels: animals/nature, consumption, environmental sociology, food, politics, science/technology
Here is a link to TV ads for Suave shampoo (sorry, I can't figure out how to embed it; click on the "Beauty" tab on the left, then the "Advertising: TV ads" link). The first one claims that having kids makes both your hair and your breasts flat. The third ad says that "89% of women" say they have "let themselves go," but then announces that with Suave, "100% can get themselves back."
Here is a link to a report on a survey Suave conducted, titled "Can Motherhood and Womanhood Coexist?" Here are some excerpts:
A whopping 84 percent admit they’ve let their appearance slide since
becoming a mom and that taking care of their appearance has become more of a
wish than a reality. The majority (66 percent) say guilt is one of the barriers
to self care.
The brand’s 360 degree 'Say Yes to Beautiful' integrated marketing
campaign reminds moms that beauty has a place amongst the dirty dishes and piles
of laundry that are an inevitable part of motherhood.
Here is a website where you can quickly get U.S. Census Bureau data for a particular zip code. I use it to get information for my classes to help students make a connection to things we're talking about sometimes. It has things like racial breakdown, educational levels, and average income.
This is a page out of an old school book, Maury's New Complete Geography (1906). The plate is labeled "Race Types." See the key at the bottom to which images are "caucasion," "mongolian," "malay," and "ethiopian." (You should be able to click on the image to see it larger.)
Found here thanks to lawgeek.
This is a fun image from today's New York Times article about online dating sites that might be a nice background to a discussion of online dating or social networks more generally (or an illustration of the normalization of heterosexual marriage):
Posted by Lisa Tuesday, January 29, 2008 at 11:20 AM 1 comments Labels: love, marriage/family, social networks
Super creepy TAB commercial:
Another doozy from Molly M!
Here's another on the same theme (youtube says it's from the '60s):
Here's another from 1982:
And this one, from 1984, cannot be beat for it's essential '80s vibe:
Posted by Lisa Monday, January 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM 3 comments Labels: bodies, diet/exercise industry, fat, food, gender, history, marriage/family
Click here to watch a two-and-a-half minute video on CNN that addresses last year's spate of race- and ethnicity-themed parties (see here). What is perhaps most amazing about it is the unbelievably impoverished analysis of what is happening and the fact that the video for some reason decides to end on an uplifting note ("their classmates had an important lesson on the danger of stereotyping").
Thanks to Richard for this lead.
Posted by Lisa Sunday, January 27, 2008 at 9:11 PM 0 comments Labels: media, prejudice/discrimination, race/ethnicity
The coining of the term "frankenfood" to refer to genetically-modified food is an excellent example of the way in which words matter. As of today, a search for the word in google returns about 57,000 hits. It's been quite an effective frame for the anti-GM food activists. Here are some examples of their work:


Sources, in order, Green Acres Farm, Monsterzine, and Democratic Underground.
Posted by Lisa at 4:57 PM 0 comments Labels: discourse/rhetoric, environmental sociology, food, health/medicine, science/technology
These advertisements, the first two for a brand of jeans called Apple Bottoms, all fetishize black women's behinds:

NEW: 
Underneath Beyonce's name it says: "The body, the booty, the backstabbing."
In this two-page spread, the body isn't necessarily black... but it might be an interesting question as to whether the viewers assume, or might be expected to assume, it is.

Text:
MY BUTT is big
and round like the letter c
and ten thousand lunges
have made it rounder
but not smaller
and that's just fine.
It's a space heater
for myside of the bed
It's my ambassador
to those who walk behind me
It's a border collie
that herds skinny women
away from the best deals
at clothing sales.
My butt is big
and that's just fine
and those who might scorn it
are invited to kiss it.
Posted by Lisa Saturday, January 26, 2008 at 7:13 PM 0 comments Labels: bodies, gender, race/ethnicity
This product nicely captures the fallacious ideas that (1) to be a "liberated" woman is to do what men do and (2) that "liberated" women necessarily emasculate men in a zero sum game.
Posted by Lisa Friday, January 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM 0 comments Labels: feminism, gender, marriage/family
Rudov is a regular commentator on FOX News. Here is the text from the website selling this book:
"Are You Wining & Dining Her for Sex?Here's a companion graphic about gold-diggers:Most men pay their girlfriends and wives like prostitutes—cash, dinners, vacations, jewelry, cars, homes, and clothing—in exchange for sex. Not only unnecessary and emasculating, such stupid male behavior induces “purchased and entitled” women to fake their orgasms.
Like a car, a woman will take you where you guide her—assuming she’s a good match and you’re a good driver. Ignore her pings and rattles, and she’ll stop operating, strand you, or put you in a ditch.
Marc Rudov's new book—Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper CablesTM—helps men avoid golddiggers, learn what really turns women on, and end self-destructive chivalry. This provocative and hilarious book is a perfect sequel and companion to The Man's No-Nonsense Guide to Women. There's no book like it in the world."

Posted by Gwen Thursday, January 24, 2008 at 8:25 PM 0 comments Labels: gender, humor, objectification, prejudice/discrimination, sex
Sociological Images reader Julie C. found this awesome ad in a newspaper from the 1960s:
The text:
“If skinny, thin and underweight take improved WATE-ON to help put on pounds and inches of firm, healthy looking flesh. WATE-ON supplies weight gaining calories plus vitamins, minerals, protein and other beneficial nutrients. Clinically tested. Fast weight gains 4, 6, 10… as much as 20 and 30 pounds have been reported. No over-eating. Helps make bustline, cheeks, arms, legs fill out, helps put firm solid flesh on skinny figures all over body. Helps fight fatigue, low resistance, sleeplessness and nervousness that so often accompany underweight. Underweight children and convalescents can take WATE-ON. It’s a clinically tested, pleasant formula sold around the world. Buy some today and start putting on weight FAST. Satisfaction from 1st bottle or price refunded. At drug stores everywhere.”
Click here and scroll down for a map showing the number and % of Muslims in various European countries. From NPR.
Posted by Gwen at 10:36 AM 0 comments Labels: immigration, international comparisons, multiculturalism, race/ethnicity, religion

An ad for a floral shop: "He chose her. She chose us."
Found in Zions Bank Community magazine, January/February 2008 issue.
Posted by Ron Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 6:25 PM 2 comments Labels: capitalism, class, economics, international comparisons
Posted by Ron at 5:59 PM 0 comments Labels: gender, Kenya, politics, race/ethnicity, social movement

This is an ad for Tao Asian bistro and nightclub in Las Vegas. The tagline is "Always a happy ending." Note the naked woman's body with the presumably Chinese characters on her. And of course a "happy ending" is often associated with Asian massage parlors...
Posted by Gwen Monday, January 21, 2008 at 7:17 PM 2 comments Labels: gender, marketing, objectification, race/ethnicity, sex
These three confessions, from Post Secret this week, illustrate that "ethnic" hair carries meaning (in the first authenticity, in the second ugliness, and in the third it's left open) and how some women feel about that:


I find these posters to be gut-wrenchingly horrible. They are designed to scare teenagers into taking precautions against pregnancy by demonizing teenagers who get (someone) pregnant. The way in which teens are portrayed in these images suggests that the organization, the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, doesn't care about teenagers, only in controlling their behavior.
Each poster is followed by its text.
"I had sex so my boyfriend wouldn't REJECT me. Now, I have a baby. And no boyfriends."
"Now that I'm home with a baby, NOBODY calls me anymore."
"All it took was one PRICK to get my girlfriend pregnant. At least that's what her friends say."
"Condoms are CHEAP. If we'd used one, I wouldn't have to tell my parents I'm pregnant."
I want to be out with my friends. Instead, I'm changing DIRTY diapers at home."
Posted by Lisa Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 5:48 PM 7 comments Labels: ***our favorites***, children/youth, gender, public service announcements, sex
Image via: Sports Image Times
Posted by Richard Saturday, January 19, 2008 at 2:26 AM 2 comments Labels: cars, demography, immigration, marketing, sports
These are Italian candies with chocolate inside. You can read a description of them here (scroll down the page quite a bit). I'm not sure what the point of the shiny dot on the forehead is.
Thanks to Denise H. for finding this image! 
Posted by Gwen Friday, January 18, 2008 at 8:30 AM 2 comments Labels: food, Italy, objectification, race/ethnicity
Despite all kinds of "truces" and "promises" in the media lately about "leaving race and gender out" of the democratic primaries, gender and race are obviously a part of this presidential election cycle.
But, here's a newsflash: even when the candidates are all white men, gender and race are STILL a part of the decisions made about who should be president.
Think back to 2004 for a moment-- remember all those political cartoons criticizing Kerry for being too "French" (as opposed to American Cowboy) and generally feminizing his image (feminine = bad for politics) in political cartoons. Here are 2 examples:

I'm fascinated by the anti-Hillary Clinton facebook groups. There are dozens of these groups, but four groups have the most members.












Posted by Anonymous at 6:25 AM 6 comments Labels: discourse/rhetoric, election 2008, gender, politics, prejudice/discrimination, race/ethnicity
Thanks to Laura K. for bringing my attention to UrbanDictionary.com, a site where users provide definitions for slang terms and examples of their usage. Here's a real gem:
Life support system for a pussy: Any human being that is female. Good lord, woman, all you are is a life support system for a pussy!That's...great. Note the tags on the post too--equally charming.
Posted by Gwen Thursday, January 17, 2008 at 9:05 PM 0 comments Labels: gender, objectification, prejudice/discrimination, sex
Shameless self-promotion... and some really interesting findings regarding knowledge and frequency of orgasm in a non-random population of undergraduates. This first graph shows the percent of male and female respondents who (1) correctly located the clitoris on a map of the vulva and (2) correctly answered a series of true/false questions about the clitoris.
You'll see that there is surprising little difference between men and women (considering that women have had access to a clitoris all their lives and men have had access only recently, if at all), though you'll see that men are more likely to think most women will have an orgasm from penile-vaginal sex (most women don't) and women are more likely to think the g-spot is another name for the clitoris (it's not). These two cancelled each other out such that the average knowledge score for men and women was statistically the same. The same!
It's this next graph that's the real kicker. This graph shows the relationship between how well a woman scored on the clitoral knowledge tests (on a 0-5 scale) and how frequently she has an orgasm during masturbation and with a partner. You'll see a nice positive relationship between knowledge and orgasm in masturbation and no relationship at all between knowledge and orgasm with a partner. (For fun, notice that the average score on the clitoral knowledge measure for women who'd never had an orgasm with a partner and who always do is the same. Also notice that there are 124 women in that never category, it's not just a handful of women who are somehow "dysfunctional.")
So, for some reason (feel free to speculate), even when women know about their own bodies, they either keep it to themselves, or have partners that don't want to hear it, or both.
If you want to see the paper, here's the cite:
Wade, L., E. Kremer, & J. Brown. 2005. The Incidental Orgasm: The Presence of Clitoral Knowledge and the Absence of Orgasm for Women. Women and Health 42, 1: 117-138.
Email me at lwade@oxy.edu if you'd like a copy.